By Seli Baisie
In response to Kennedy Agyapong’s recent video, where he was seen threatening President Akufo-Addo and Vice President Dr. Mahamamudu Bawumia, a diverse range of opinions have emerged on social media.
Ken Agyapong’s sharp words were directed at the alleged expulsion of his polling agent during the party’s flag bearer elections, a move that triggered his forceful reaction.
As discussions unfold online, netizens have engaged in a spirited debate about Agyapong’s suitability as presidential material, highlighting both his strengths and weaknesses.
A segment of social media users voiced their scepticism about Agyapong’s presidential caliber.
One Twitter user, @__Sharyf, succinctly captured this sentiment in a post: “You can say what you want but Kennedy Agyapong is not presidential material.”
These sceptics appear to be concerned about Agyapong’s outspoken and often confrontational nature, which they believe might not align with the diplomatic demands of a presidential role.
They question whether his recent behaviour demonstrates the level of restraint and statesmanship expected from a leader.
Conversely, there are those who see potential in Agyapong’s candid approach and grassroots connections. These supporters contend that Agyapong’s ability to resonate with ordinary citizens could actually propel him to the presidency but as an independent candidate.
His unfiltered manner of speaking has endeared him to segments of the population who view him as a fearless advocate for their concerns.
This group argues that a departure from traditional political norms might be just what the nation needs to bring about fresh perspectives and effective change.
As discussions continue, some netizens remain divided over whether Agyapong’s outspoken nature and grassroots appeal could lead him to the presidency, potentially reshaping the country’s political.