By: Nana Karikari, Senior Global Affairs Correspondent
For Ghanaians, Burkina Faso’s decision to remove visa fees for African travelers resonates on multiple levels, intertwining pan-African ideals with complex geopolitical realities. While many celebrate the move as a step toward greater African unity, it also prompts a deeper examination of the region’s shifting power dynamics and security challenges. The announcement, championed by Burkina Faso’s military leader Captain Ibrahim Traoré, is seen as a tangible expression of the Pan-Africanist vision that Ghana has long promoted, a legacy rooted in the ideals of its first president, Kwame Nkrumah.
A Shared Pan-African Dream
The policy change aligns with a long-standing aspiration for an integrated Africa, a vision that has been a cornerstone of Ghana’s foreign policy for decades. Ghana itself has been a vocal proponent of easing travel requirements across the continent, with President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo previously approving a policy to make Ghana visa-free for all African passport holders. A senior official at Ghana’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who asked to remain anonymous, told reporters, “This is the kind of practical Pan-Africanism we have always advocated for. It’s about breaking down artificial barriers and fostering genuine brotherhood.” For many ordinary Ghanaians, this sentiment is powerful. “It makes me proud to see a neighboring country take this step,” said Nana Esi Botsio, a market trader in Accra. “It’s a bold move that shows they believe in a united Africa, not just in words but in actions.”
The Delicate Balance of Regional Tensions

However, the feel-good narrative of Pan-Africanism is tempered by the complicated backdrop of Burkina Faso’s withdrawal from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Burkina Faso, along with Mali and Niger, formed the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) after their military juntas were sanctioned by ECOWAS. This has left many Ghanaians feeling conflicted. On one hand, the visa fee removal is a positive step. On the other hand, it comes from a regime that has defied the regional bloc that Ghana helped to found and continues to support.
“It’s a paradox,” a political analyst from the University of Ghana, Dr. Kwesi Botchway, stated. “Captain Traoré is using a tool of regional integration to promote his image, even as his government works to dismantle the very institution—ECOWAS—that was created to facilitate this kind of integration.” This situation puts Ghana in a difficult position, as it must balance its commitment to ECOWAS with its historical ties and shared Pan-Africanist values with its northern neighbor.
A Charismatic Leader and Ghanaian Admiration

The analysis must also acknowledge the widespread and sometimes controversial popularity of Captain Traoré himself among a segment of the Ghanaian populace, particularly the youth. His anti-colonial rhetoric and public defiance of Western powers have made him a hero to some. Videos of his speeches go viral on Ghanaian social media, fueling a sense of national pride and revolutionary fervor. “He speaks our mind,” said Kwame Osei, a student at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST). “He is not afraid to stand up to the West. Our own leaders should learn from him.”
This sentiment, while not universally held, reflects a growing frustration with a perceived lack of strong leadership on the continent and a yearning for leaders who prioritize African interests above all else. However, this admiration exists alongside a more cautious view among many older Ghanaians and political elites, who remember the instability of past military regimes and prioritize democratic governance and the rule of law. They worry that romanticizing a military leader, no matter how charismatic, undermines Ghana’s own democratic principles.
Security and Economic Concerns
Beyond the political sphere, the visa policy has significant human and practical implications for Ghanaians. Travel between Ghana and Burkina Faso is frequent, driven by trade, family ties, and cultural exchanges. While Ghanaians, as ECOWAS citizens, already enjoyed visa-free travel to Burkina Faso, the new policy’s emphasis on free online applications for all Africans could be a double-edged sword. “The devil is in the details,” cautioned a truck driver named Mohammed Ali who frequently transports goods to Burkina Faso. “If this new system makes the process at the border more cumbersome, it won’t matter that the visa is free.” There are also lingering security concerns.
The ongoing jihadist insurgency in the Sahel region, which has seen violent attacks spill over into Ghana’s northern border communities, casts a long shadow. The new policy could, in theory, improve tourism and cultural exchange, but the reality of the security situation on the ground remains a major deterrent for potential Ghanaian visitors. The move is a strong symbolic gesture, but its practical impact on trade and tourism will depend on how the online application process is managed and, more importantly, whether the Burkinabe government can improve security. “The promise of a free visa is excellent,” a Ghanaian tour operator said. “But what people really need to see is a free and safe road.”
The Economic Gamble
While presented as a gesture of Pan-African solidarity, the policy also appears to be a shrewd economic move by the junta. By removing visa fees, Burkina Faso aims to boost its tourism sector and attract investment from across the continent. This is a crucial strategy as the country faces sanctions from ECOWAS and seeks to diversify its economic partnerships away from traditional Western allies. For Ghana, this presents both an opportunity and a challenge. While it could facilitate increased cross-border trade, it also positions Burkina Faso as a more attractive hub for business, potentially drawing away some foreign direct investment from Ghana.
A Ghanaian economist from the Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research (ISSER), Dr. Philip Mensah, explained, “The visa fee is a small part of the equation. What the junta is really doing is sending a signal: we are open for business, we are looking for new partners, and we are not defined by the sanctions.” The policy is, in essence, a gambit to leverage African unity for economic gain, reflecting the junta’s immediate need to shore up its finances and create a narrative of prosperity despite its political isolation. This makes the move not just a political statement, but a calculated step in a broader economic strategy.
A Historical Echo of Pan-African Ideals
This is not the first time Ghana has had to navigate its relationship with Burkina Faso under a revolutionary Pan-Africanist leader. The current situation draws parallels to the era of Ghana’s Flight Lieutenant Jerry John Rawlings and Burkina Faso’s Captain Thomas Sankara in the 1980s. Both leaders, military men who seized power through coups, shared a similar vision of African self-reliance and anti-imperialism. Their close relationship led to joint military exercises and strengthened bilateral ties, bypassing traditional diplomatic channels. Just as today, that era was characterized by a potent blend of revolutionary zeal and political tension within the region. An ECOWAS official, speaking on condition of anonymity, noted, “The current alliance with Mali and Niger and the rhetoric against the West are echoes of the past.
The danger, as we learned then, is that while these alliances are powerful symbols, they can also lead to isolation from the very regional bodies that promote stability and economic growth.” For Ghanaians, the historical parallel serves as a powerful reminder that while the dream of a united Africa is noble, its path is often fraught with political complexities and a delicate balance between national sovereignty and regional cooperation.
Navigating Complex Bilateral Ties
The current state of Ghana and Burkina Faso’s relationship is a practical exercise in managing competing priorities. Despite the political rift between the Burkinabe junta and ECOWAS, Ghana has adopted a pragmatic approach to its bilateral relations. This is evidenced by recent high-level meetings and ongoing discussions about strengthening trade and security. The government of Ghana has prioritized engagement over isolation, as demonstrated by its diplomatic outreach to the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) to restore trust and foster cooperation. A Ghanaian diplomat, speaking on a recent visit to Ouagadougou, emphasized that “our relationship with Burkina Faso goes beyond political regimes. We share a border, people, and a destiny. We must work together to secure our shared borders and facilitate trade for the benefit of our citizens.”
This pragmatic stance reflects Ghana’s dual challenge of upholding democratic principles within ECOWAS while also ensuring the stability and security of its northern border, which remains under threat from the ongoing insurgency. It highlights a strategic pivot toward a more flexible, realpolitik foreign policy that prioritizes tangible cooperation on security and trade over ideological rigidity.
The Broader African Unity Agenda
Burkina Faso’s policy, while politically charged, is also a direct reflection of a long-term goal of the African Union (AU) itself. Aspiration 2 of the AU’s Agenda 2063 envisions “an integrated continent, politically united, based on the ideals of Pan-Africanism.” A key part of this vision is a continent with “seamless borders” and the free movement of people. The AU has actively promoted a single African passport and has been urging member states to liberalize their visa regimes.
A recent AU report highlighted that only a handful of countries, including Rwanda, Seychelles, and The Gambia, offer visa-free travel to all African citizens. In this context, Burkina Faso’s move is not an anomaly but an alignment with a core continental ambition that many countries have been slow to adopt. This reinforces the idea that the junta is tapping into a powerful and popular pan-Africanist narrative. It positions Captain Traoré’s government as a progressive leader in continental integration, even as his actions simultaneously undermine the regional body, ECOWAS, that was created for that very purpose. This creates a powerful contrast that resonates deeply with Ghanaians who are committed to both African unity and democratic stability.









One Response
ECOWAS has not done much to unite the countries within the block. It is manipulated by Western values and not African values.
Most of us see the organizers as a puppet and tool of the West to keep their grip on black West Africans.