After a long tug-of-war between the European Commission and The New York Times over transparency surrounding the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine contracts, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) today ruled that the Commission “has not given a plausible explanation to justify the non-possession of the requested documents.”
According to the Court, the Commission cannot simply claim it does not hold the requested documents; it must provide credible explanations that enable both the public and the Court to understand why those documents cannot be located.
The ECJ found that The New York Times had submitted relevant and consistent evidence indicating the existence of text messages between the President of the Commission and the CEO of Pfizer regarding the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines.
“These contracts were totally unprecedented in a totally unprecedented context,” said an EU official ahead of the ruling.
The publication uncovered the existence of the messages in 2021 during interviews with Bourla, but encountered obstacles when requesting access to them. The Commission claimed it could not provide the texts.
After repeated unsuccessful attempts to obtain the messages, The New York Times brought the matter before the ECJ in January 2023.
The Court has now determined that the Commission has failed to adequately clarify whether the requested text messages were deleted and, if so, whether the deletion occurred deliberately or automatically.
The European Commission has now two months to appeal the Court of Justice’s decision.
This is a developing story, more update soon.
SOURCE: EURONEWS
